
Nerd factor 9, engage! Okay, this one isn’t my fault. Blame my friend Zach of Hanlon’s Razor for starting this argument this morning, which got me thinking about the most popular mysterious sci-fi show of the last decade: Lost. I, like many, hated the finale. Well, that’s not accurate. I disliked the finale and hated the entire last season for what the finale did in explaining it, and I retroactively hated the show for failing to satisfyingly bring everything around.
We’ve been arguing about the focus of Lost, and what the show wanted to do and why it wanted to do it. Lost was a deeply character-driven show, and the final season proves that, as the showrunners said from the beginning, the characters and how they acted, grew, changed, and lives were more important than the mythology of the island. For a lot of people, that’s a satisfying explanation for why the show was the way it was, and why it left so many questions unanswered or vaguely answered. The mystery doesn’t matter compared to the people, and how they grew and changed. The problem is that it’s a flimsy excuse. You can have great character development and powerful character studies while still offering a mystery-filled narrative that manages to bring everything to a satisfying conclusion. Babylon 5 proved that.
Spoilers ahead for both Lost and Babylon 5. Also, this piece is ridiculously long, and I am a giant nerd for writing it.